Keystone Floor and More L.L.C. v. Registrar of Contractors, Kang (CA 1 7/15/09)

Remember the name? You might, we’ve already written about it; the court released it on July 2. Why release it again? To correct a few minor typos in the original. This has happened before. How did it get out the door with typos? And why promulgate it like a new opinion, with a new date, with nothing to explain what’s going on and why those of us who already read it needn’t pay any attention? Mere lawyers are apparently not encouraged to know.